Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 106% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |