Iris Graphics 550 vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing Iris Graphics 550 and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 550 and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 550 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 63 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 550 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |