Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 2000D

    When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price
    Quadro 2000D

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro 2000D
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 62 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI
      Check Price
    • Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 2−3
    ultra / 1080p 2−3 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 12−14 12−14
    medium / 1080p 5−6 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro 2000D
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake Fermi
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GF106
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 10 July 2019 5 October 2011
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 625 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 1,170 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 20.00
    Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops
    Length 178 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.103 N/A
    CUDA 2.1
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares