Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 2000D

    When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price
    Quadro 2000D

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro 2000D
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 62 Watt
    Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI
      Check Price
    • Quadro 2000D has 37% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 9−10 2−3
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 21−24 12−14
    medium / 1080p 10−12 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro 2000D.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro 2000D
    Architecture Gen. 7.5 Haswell Fermi
    Code name Haswell GT3e GF106
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 5 June 2013 5 October 2011
    Pipelines 40 192
    Core clock speed 200 MHz 625 MHz
    Boost Clock 1300 MHz
    Transistor count 392 million 1,170 million
    Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 52.00 20.00
    Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 480.0 gflops
    Length 178 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.80 N/A
    CUDA 2.1
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares