Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 2000D

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000D, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Quadro 2000D, check out specs charts below.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Quadro 2000D

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Quadro 2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	62 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
	Check Price

Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	2−3
ultra / 1080p	3−4	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	5−6	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	14−16
medium / 1080p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	85−90	90−95
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
QHD / 1440p	24−27	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
high / 768p	60−65	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	70−75	75−80
medium / 768p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	20−22
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	6−7	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	2−3
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	12−14	10−12
medium / 1080p	6−7	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	8−9	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	9−10	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	18−20
medium / 1080p	10−11	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	40−45	45−50
medium / 768p	35−40	−
high / 1080p	8−9	4−5
ultra / 1080p	5−6	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	3−4	1−2
ultra / 1080p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	4−5
medium / 1080p	5−6	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
high / 1080p	80−85	80−85
ultra / 1080p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	16−18	9−10
medium / 768p	12−14	8−9
high / 1080p	7−8	4−5
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	80−85	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
high / 768p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D.

Full Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Quadro 2000D
Architecture	Gen. 8 Broadwell	Fermi
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GF106
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 June 2015	5 October 2011
Pipelines	48	192
Core clock speed	300 MHz	625 MHz
Boost Clock	1150 MHz
Transistor count	189 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	40.80	20.00
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length		178 mm
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth		41.6 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.80	N/A
CUDA		2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		31 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 2000D

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares