Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro 2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro 2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro 2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Quadro 2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs HD Graphics 530
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M