Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 225 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs HD Graphics 530
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M