Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe MAX Graphics will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1666 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | Fermi |
| Code name | iDG1LPDEV | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 31 October 2020 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |