Quadro 2000D vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000D and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000D and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro CX
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro CX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro CX has 141% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 23 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro CX is 89 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro 2000D and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro CX | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF106 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |