Quadro 2000D vs Quadro K2100M
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Quadro K2100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Quadro K2100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 12% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2100M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 42 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 36% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF106 | GK106 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 38 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |