Quadro 2000D vs Radeon 520
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon 520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon 520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 24% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 405 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 350 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GF106 | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |