Quadro 2000D vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 555 has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 555 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 230 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 2480 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF106 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |