Quadro 2000D vs Radeon Pro 560X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro 560X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro 560X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560X has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 282 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 2480 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 212% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
| Code name | GF106 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 64.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |