Quadro 2000D vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro Vega 16, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 466% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 281% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 238% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
| Code name | GF106 | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |