Quadro 2000D vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 457 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF106 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |