Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 416% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | GF106 | Bristol Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 1 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3100 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |