Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 275 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 2596 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF106 | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | no data |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs HD Graphics 530
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro 2000D vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M