Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 M365X
When choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M365X.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 275 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1475 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF106 | Tropo |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |