Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 M390X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M390X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M390X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390X has 61% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M390X has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 98 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GF106 | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |