Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 303% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 98 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1350 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 477% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3 |
Code name | GF106 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |