Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 M470
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M470, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M470 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M470 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M470 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M470 - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M470 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Metro Exodus is 366% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 2 |
| Code name | GF106 | Saturn |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |