Quadro 2000D vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000D and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000D and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
62 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 298% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 51 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro 2000D and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 70 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 532 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
20−22
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
4−5
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
9−10
60−65
medium / 768p
8−9
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro 2000D.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF106
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
5 October 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
625 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
20.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
178 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
