Quadro 2000D vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Tesla M10
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
- Tesla M10 has 262% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 408 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M10 is 89 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 2600 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF106 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |