Quadro 2000D vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000D and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000D and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro 2000D

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000D	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI
		Check Price

Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	30−33
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	45−50
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	90−95	170−180
ultra / 1080p	35−40	90−95
QHD / 1440p	21−24	50−55
4K / 2160p	16−18	24−27
high / 768p	65−70	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	20−22	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	10−12	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	4−5	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 2000D.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	9−10	50−55
medium / 768p	8−9	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro 2000D.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000D	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Fermi	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GF106	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 October 2011	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	625 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	20.00
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops
Length	178 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Quadro 2000D vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares