Quadro 2000D vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000D and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF106 | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs HD Graphics 530
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Quadro 2000D vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640