FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V5900 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro 2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 50 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro 2000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 1100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
1−2
medium / 1080p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
100−110
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
high / 768p
75−80
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
7−8
−
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
0−1
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
high / 1080p
10−11
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
low / 720p
10−11
0−1
medium / 1080p
4−5
−
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 720p
10−11
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
low / 768p
20−22
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Code name
Cayman
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
22 February 2011
Pipelines
512
192
Core clock speed
600 MHz
550 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
17.60
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
422.4 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
