FirePro W4100 vs Quadro 2000M
In this comparison between FirePro W4100 and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4100
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4100 and Quadro 2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W4100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4100 is 80 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro W4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4100 is 3100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
110−120
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
30−33
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4100
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
GCN
Fermi
Code name
Cape Verde
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
512
192
Core clock speed
630 MHz
550 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
20.16
17.60
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
422.4 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
