FirePro W9000 vs Quadro 2000M
When choosing between FirePro W9000 and Quadro 2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W9000 and Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W9000
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W9000 has 536% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro W9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 425 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 4600 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
0−1
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
1−2
medium / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
0−1
medium / 1080p
60−65
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W9000 and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
60−65
medium / 768p
220−230
27−30
ultra / 1080p
180−190
7−8
QHD / 1440p
110−120
−
4K / 2160p
70−75
−
high / 768p
210−220
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
FirePro W9000 and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
110−120
10−11
ultra / 1080p
100−110
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
45−50
−
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
80−85
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
21−24
medium / 1080p
110−120
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
0−1
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
0−1
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
0−1
medium / 1080p
65−70
0−1
low / 768p
140−150
18−20
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
0−1
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
−
low / 768p
130−140
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
100−110
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
low / 768p
130−140
0−1
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
45−50
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
50−55
0−1
high / 768p
60−65
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W9000
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Code name
Tahiti
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
14 June 2012
22 February 2011
Pipelines
2048
192
Core clock speed
975 MHz
550 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
124.8
17.60
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops
422.4 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
460 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price