GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro 2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro 2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 154% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1138 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro 2000M | |
Architecture | Tesla | Fermi |
Code name | G92 | Fermi |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 754 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |