GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro 2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro 2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro 2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro 2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro 2000M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 220% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 295% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro 2000M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | Fermi | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |