GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro 2000M

When choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 263% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro 2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 665 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 703 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	1−2
medium / 1080p	18−20	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	200−210	60−65
medium / 768p	170−180	27−30
ultra / 1080p	95−100	7−8
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	130−140	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	10−11
ultra / 1080p	60−65	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	21−24
medium / 1080p	50−55	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	0−1
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	27−30	0−1
low / 768p	80−85	18−20
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	27−30	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	9−10	−
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 720p	55−60	8−9
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 768p	50−55	0−1
medium / 768p	30−35	−
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	30−35	0−1
high / 768p	50−55	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro 2000M
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Code name	GF100	Fermi
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	22 February 2011
Pipelines	352	192
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	550 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	17.60
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	422.4 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.1
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s	27 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro 2000M

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares