GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro 2000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M or Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 394 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
1−2
medium / 1080p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
60−65
medium / 768p
200−210
27−30
ultra / 1080p
110−120
7−8
QHD / 1440p
85−90
−
4K / 2160p
45−50
−
high / 768p
160−170
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
100−110
10−11
ultra / 1080p
75−80
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
27−30
−
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
21−24
medium / 1080p
70−75
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
0−1
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
0−1
low / 768p
100−110
18−20
medium / 768p
90−95
−
high / 1080p
40−45
0−1
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
70−75
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
low / 768p
70−75
0−1
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
high / 768p
55−60
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Code name
N16E-GS, N16E-GR
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 January 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
1024
192
Core clock speed
944 MHz
550 MHz
Boost Clock
950 / 1151 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
73.60
17.60
Floating-point performance
2,355 gflops
422.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
G-SYNC support
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
1024
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
GameStream
+
GeForce ShadowPlay
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
BatteryBoost
+
Check Price
Check Price