Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 2000M

    In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price
    Quadro 2000M Check Price

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro 2000M here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops
    Quadro 2000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro 2000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt
    Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Memory type eDRAM DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro 2000M has 22% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 350 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 9−10 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 −
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 21−24 1−2
    medium / 1080p 10−12 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Quadro 2000M.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro 2000M
    Architecture Gen. 7.5 Haswell Fermi
    Code name Haswell GT3e Fermi
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 5 June 2013 22 February 2011
    Pipelines 40 192
    Core clock speed 200 MHz 550 MHz
    Boost Clock 1300 MHz
    Transistor count 392 million 1,170 million
    Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 52.00 17.60
    Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 422.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 900 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.80 N/A
    CUDA 2.1
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 27 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares