Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro 2000M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 200 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
1−2
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
60−65
medium / 768p
130−140
27−30
ultra / 1080p
65−70
7−8
QHD / 1440p
35−40
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
95−100
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
10−11
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 227% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
low / 768p
60−65
18−20
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 83% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
30−35
0−1
medium / 768p
21−24
−
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
high / 768p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Fermi
Code name
Skylake GT4e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
72
192
Core clock speed
350 MHz
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
17.60
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.97
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
