Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Quadro 2000M, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
27−30
ultra / 1080p
40−45
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−11
0−1
low / 768p
40−45
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
24−27
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
low / 768p
16−18
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Fermi
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
17.60
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
422.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price