Quadro 2000M vs Quadro 4000

In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Quadro 4000 Check Price

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	142 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 4000 has 158% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro 4000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 4000 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro 4000 are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 75 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro 4000 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 1908 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	16−18
medium / 1080p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	60−65	130−140
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	9−10
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	24−27
medium / 768p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Quadro 4000
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Code name	Fermi	GF100
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 February 2011	2 November 2010
Pipelines	192	256
Core clock speed	550 MHz	475 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	15.20
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	486.4 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	89.86 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s	44 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Quadro 4000

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares