Quadro 2000M vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000M and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000M and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 52 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 700 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro 2000M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Fermi | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |