Quadro 2000M vs Quadro K2000D
When comparing Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 7% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000D have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2000D - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 404 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000D - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 3100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
27−30
110−120
ultra / 1080p
7−8
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro K2000D
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
Fermi
GK107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
1 March 2013
Pipelines
192
384
Core clock speed
550 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
30.53
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
31 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price