Quadro 2000M vs Quadro K620

In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M has 34% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K620 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K620 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 508 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	24−27
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	60−65	180−190
medium / 768p	27−30	150−160
ultra / 1080p	7−8	75−80
QHD / 1440p	−	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 375% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	10−11	80−85
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 210% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	80−85
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 272% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
low / 768p	18−20	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	40−45
medium / 768p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	14−16	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
high / 768p	12−14	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Quadro K620
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Code name	Fermi	GM107
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 February 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	26.98
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length		160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	2.1	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s	104 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Quadro K620

Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares