Quadro 2000M vs Quadro M4000M
In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro M4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 2000M and Quadro M4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 81% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 425 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 4112 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 2000M and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
Quadro 2000M and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
Fermi
GM204
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
2 October 2015
Pipelines
192
1,280
Core clock speed
550 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
78.00
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
2,496 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price