Quadro 2000M vs Radeon Pro 460

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 Check Price

Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Radeon Pro 460 here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Radeon Pro 460 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 4100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon Pro 460
Architecture	Fermi	Polaris
Code name	Fermi	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 February 2011	8 August 2016
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	550 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		907 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	58.05
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	1,858 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1
FreeSync		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s	227 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Radeon Pro 460

Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares