Quadro 2000M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

When choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Check Price

Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1500 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	1−2	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	40−45
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	240−250
medium / 768p	27−30	210−220
ultra / 1080p	7−8	130−140
QHD / 1440p	−	100−110
4K / 2160p	−	60−65
high / 768p	16−18	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	130−140
medium / 1080p	0−1	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 513% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
low / 768p	18−20	110−120
medium / 768p	−	100−110
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 925% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	0−1	85−90
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture	Fermi	Vega
Code name	Fermi	Vega Mobile
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 February 2011	15 November 2018
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	550 MHz
Boost Clock		1190 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	76.16
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	1024 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	307.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

Quadro 2000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares