Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GT 640M
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GT 445M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GT 445M
- Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Quadro 2000M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics