Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |