Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro 2000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |