Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |