Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M360
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Check Price |