Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M365X

In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X Check Price

Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M365X are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M365X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Radeon R9 M365X here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Radeon R9 M365X Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon R9 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	16−18
medium / 1080p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	60−65	130−140
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 73% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	24−27
medium / 768p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon R9 M365X
Architecture	Fermi	GCN
Code name	Fermi	Tropo
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2011	6 May 2015
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	550 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	37.00
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	1,184 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	Not Listed
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.1
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M365X

Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M365X are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares