FirePro W600 vs Quadro 3000M

When choosing between FirePro W600 and Quadro 3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W600 and Quadro 3000M.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Quadro 3000M Check Price

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:

Quadro 3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
FirePro W600 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W600 and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W600 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W600 is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W600 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 3375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	10−11	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	16−18
medium / 1080p	14−16	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W600 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	150−160	120−130
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
ultra / 1080p	60−65	40−45
QHD / 1440p	30−35	21−24
4K / 2160p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	90−95	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	65−70	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	10−12
medium / 1080p	10−11	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	65−70	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	18−20
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	45−50
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	5−6	2−3
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	4−5
medium / 1080p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	80−85
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	14−16	6−7
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	30−33	10−11
medium / 768p	18−20	8−9
high / 1080p	10−12	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	14−16
high / 768p	40−45	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro 3000M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro 3000M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Cape Verde	Fermi
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	22 February 2011
Pipelines	512	240
Core clock speed	750 MHz	450 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	18.00
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	432.0 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	28 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Quadro 3000M

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares