FirePro W7000 vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing FirePro W7000 and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7000 and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7000
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7000 has 366% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 500 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 4175 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
2−3
ultra / 1080p
12−14
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W7000 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
120−130
medium / 768p
200−210
95−100
ultra / 1080p
120−130
40−45
QHD / 1440p
90−95
21−24
4K / 2160p
50−55
16−18
high / 768p
170−180
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 137% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
80−85
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
10−12
medium / 1080p
27−30
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
5−6
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
12−14
2−3
low / 720p
70−75
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
95−100
−
high / 1080p
40−45
4−5
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
0−1
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
4−5
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
6−7
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
10−11
medium / 768p
45−50
8−9
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W7000
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Code name
Pitcairn
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 June 2012
22 February 2011
Pipelines
1280
240
Core clock speed
950 MHz
450 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
76.00
18.00
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
432.0 gflops
Length
242 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
285 Mh/s
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
6 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
